Understanding Backward Design and "Quality Matters"
Following up on our introduction to DOTS, we will now
i) concretely lay down the goals of the DOTS workshops,
ii) identify the theoretical principles underlying Backward Design, the course-design process we will be exploring throughout DOTS, and
iii) discuss the scope and value of the "Quality Matters" standards for online course design.
Start by watching a short introductory presentation by Dr. Guan (5'20").
This is a narrated slide presentation,
created and optimized for online delivery with
Clicking on the image will open the presentation in a new browser window or tab. Maximize the browser to view the presentation index, transcript, and other features.
More on issues of accessibility is available within the resources accompanying Assignment 1.
Having trouble viewing the presentation? Make sure Adobe Flash Player is installed on your computer. http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer
B. Backward Design
Introduced in the late 1980s by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe, and part of
their larger Understanding by Design framework, backward design
emphasizes assessment as a means of evaluating student capacity to apply newly
acquired knowledge in a variety of contexts.
Backward design involves three progressive stages:
- Stage One: Identify desired results
What enduring understandings do I want my students to develop?
- Stage Two: Determine acceptable evidence
How will my students demonstrate their understanding?
- Stage Three: Plan learning experiences and instruction
With what resources and activities must I present my students to
support development of the desired understanding?
short clip (3':00") with
Beginning with the end in mind (i.e. "what exactly do I want my students to know at the end of this class/module/course?"), teaching for understanding, and requiring students to apply and demonstrate their learning are not new concepts. What is new is the development, fine-tuning, formalization, and rigorous testing of specific design steps, which are also particularly well suited to address the structural and assessment challenges introduced in online learning.
To successfully implement the Backward Design process, instructors must first
decide on what is essential for students to know--what is at the core or "heart"
of a given topic--and then decide how they will know when students have reached
that goal. The designing of assessments must therefore occur in the beginning, to give
both the instructor and the students a clear destination for each course module. Once
the destination is clear, the instructor is ideally equipped to create the best roadmap to get
Do you understand DOTS & Backward Design?
Take this self-test to see!
Note: After you submit your responses and review the results, close the survey window.
This test focuses less on improving your understanding of the DOTS program and more on demonstrating Blackboard’s test features (such as types of questions and feedback automation) in low-stakes learning contexts.
For an online self-test to be effective, it must include numerous questions of multiple types, introduced by increasing complexity. More importantly, the feedback must be extensive enough to address correct responses with leading, follow-up questions and to offer customized feedback to each wrong response. You will be consulting a list of feedback tips when working on the third and last assignment for Module 1.
C. Quality Matters (QM)
The QM project develops and makes available an online course-design enhancement instrument that includes 40 quality
elements. These are distributed across eight broad standards, are derived from an extensive review of relevant research literature,
and are described in detail in the Course Design
Review Rubrics document. As a QM subscriber, DePaul has access to
this document and will be sharing portions of it with you throughout DOTS. For example,
the portion describing the Accessibility Standard elements is included in the
resources accompanying Assignment 1.
For Assignment 2, you will review a sample blended course, using the short QM review form with only the eight broad standards. A list of all 40 quality elements, grouped by standard and including a point value, is available to the left.
The main objective of the QM review process is neither to evaluate the instructor, nor to just give a "design" grade to the reviewed course. Rather, it is to assist the instructor in satisfying the most quality elements possible, improving her course design, and receiving the QM stamp of approval. In other words, rather than being a course evaluation process, the QM review is a course enhancement process, providing instructors with an opportunity to re-examine their course design based on solid standards.
Designing and delivering quality online courses is both challenging and necessary, as the demand for such courses keeps increasing exponentially. Projects like Quality Matters are much needed, welcomed, and overdue, and ultimately benefit our students.
You can visit Quality Matters at: http://www.qualitymatters.org.